Acute or chronic? Failing left ventricle in a 34 year old

Submission content Introduction: An unusual case of a very young patient without previously known cardiac disease presenting with severe left ventricular failure, detected by a point of care echocardiogram. Main Body: A 34 year old previously well man was brought to hospital after seeing his general practitioner with one month of progressive shortness of breath on exertion. This began around the time the patient received his second covid-19 vaccination. He was sleeping in a chair as he was unable to lie flat. Abnormal observations led the GP to call an ambulance. In the emergency department, the patient required oxygen 5L/min to maintain SpO2 >94%, but he was not in respiratory distress at rest. Blood pressure was 92/53mmHg, mean 67mmHg. Point of care testing for COVID-19 was negative. He was alert, with warm peripheries. Lactate was 1.0mmol/L and he was producing more than 0.5ml/kg/hr of urine. There was no ankle swelling. ECG showed sinus tachycardia. He underwent CT pulmonary angiography which demonstrated no pulmonary embolus, but there was bilateral pulmonary edema. Troponin was 17ng/l, BNP was 2700pg/ml. Furosemide 40mg was given intravenously by the general medical team. Critical care outreach asked for an urgent intensivist review given the highly unusual diagnosis of pulmonary edema in a man of this age. An immediate FUSIC Heart scan identified a dilated left ventricle with end diastolic diameter 7cm and severe global systolic impairment. The right ventricle was not severely impaired, with TAPSE 18mm. There was no significant pericardial effusion. Multiple B lines and trace pulmonary effusions were identified at the lung bases. The patient was urgently discussed with the regional cardiac unit in case of further deterioration, basic images were shared via a cloud system. A potential diagnosis of vaccination-associated myocarditis was considered,1 but in view of the low troponin, the presentation was felt most likely to represent decompensated chronic dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient disclosed a family history of early cardiac death in males. Aggressive diuresis was commenced. The patient was admitted to a monitored bed given the potential risk of arrhythmia or further haemodynamic deterioration. Advice was given that in the event of worsening hypotension, fluids should not be administered but the cardiac centre should be contacted immediately. Formal echocardiography confirmed the POCUS findings, with ejection fraction <35%. He was initiated on ACE inhibitors and beta adrenergic blockade. His symptoms improved and he was able to return home and to work, and is currently undergoing further investigations to establish the etiology of his condition. Conclusion(s): Early echocardiography provided early evidence of a cardiac cause for the patient's presentation and highlighted the severity of the underlying pathology. This directed early aggressive diuresis and safety-netting by virtue of discussion with a tertiary cardiac centre whilst it was established whether this was an acute or decompensated chronic pathology. Ultrasound findings: PLAX, PSAX and A4Ch views demonstrating a severely dilated (7cm end diastolic diameter) left ventricle with global severe systolic impairment.

Fulminant myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination rescued with venoarterial ECMO: A report of two cases

Objectives: Cases of fulminant myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination have been reported. The most severe may need venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support. Here we report two cases successfully rescued with V-A ECMO. Method(s): We included all the cases supported with V-A ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock due to myocarditis secondary to a mRNA SARS-COV2 vaccine in the high-volume adult ECMO Program in Vall Hebron University Hospital since January 2020. Result(s): We identified two cases (table). One of them was admitted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In both, a peripheral V-A ECMO was implanted in the cath lab. An intra-aortic balloon pump was needed in one case for left ventricle unloading. Support could be successfully withdrawn in a mean of five days. No major bleeding or thrombosis complications occurred. Definite microscopic diagnosis could be reached in one case (Image, 3). Treatment was the same, using 1000mg of methylprednisolone/day for 3 days. A cardiac magnetic resonance 10 days after admission showed a significant improvement in systolic function and diffuse oedema and subepicardial contrast intake in different segments (Image, 1-2). Both patients were discharged fully recovered. Conclusion(s): V-A ECMO should be established in cases of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis with refractory cardiogenic shock during the acute phase. (Table Presented).

Pleurisy and pericarditis as a cause of atypical chest pain in patients with in early post-COVID-19 period.

During the pandemic COVID-19, there has been an increase in the number of patients with non-anginal chest pain at cardiologist appointments. Objective. To assess the incidence of signs of pleurisy and pericarditis after COVID-19 in non-comorbid patients with atypical chest pain and describe their characteristics according to echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and methods. From February 2021 to January 2022, 200 outpatients were prospectively enrolled in the study, all of them suffered from a discomfort in the heart region for the first time after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Inclusion criteria: 18-50 years old, 5-12 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection, non-anginal chest pain. Exclusion criteria: pneumonia or signs of pulmonary thromboembolism, coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure or kidney disease, clinical or laboratory signs of myocarditis, oncopathology, radiation or chemotherapy of the chest in past medical history. A survey was conducted (yes/no) for the presence of general malaise, quality of life deterioration, hyperthermia, cough. Ultrasound examination of the pericardium and pleura to detect effusion or post-inflammatory changes was performed in accordance with the recommendations. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed if ultrasound imaging was poor or there was no evidence of pericardial or pleural involvement in patients with typical symptoms. Results. 82 women and 118 men were included. Median of age 39 [28-46] years old. Pericarditis was diagnosed in 152 (76%) patients, including effusive pericarditis in 119 (78%), myocarditis in 6 (3%) and myopericarditis in 49 (25%) patients, pleurisy was detected in 22 (11%) patients, exudative pleurisy - in 11 (5.5%) patients with a predominant unilateral lesion of the mediastinal-diaphragmatic region adjacent to the heart. Hyperthermia was recorded in 2.5% of cases, general malaise - in 60% and a decrease in the quality of life - in 84%. Conclusion. Serositis as a cause of atypical chest pain among young non-comorbid patients in early postCOVID was identified in 87% of patients. In the coming years, it is probably worthwhile to perform ultrasound of the pericardium and pleura in all patients with chest pain.Copyright © 2022 Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training.

A Case of a Relapsing Remitting Macrophage Activating Syndrome After Covid-19 Vaccine In a Teenager with UNC13D Heterozygous Variant of Uncertain Significance

Introduction: Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a severe hyper inflammatory condition caused by the over-activation and proliferation of T cells, NK cells and macrophages. It is often associated with complications of rheumatic/immune diseases. We present a case of a 15-year-old female who experiences recurrent episodes of MAS without any known definitive underlying etiology. Case Presentation: A 15-year-old previously healthy female developed fatigue, fevers, myalgia, chest pain, splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy 10 days after receiving her first Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Her symptoms recurred 10 days after receiving the second dose. Her myocarditis, MIS-C, and infectious work up was negative except for positive EBV IgG. Laboratory studies revealed anemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and hyperferritinemia. She initially responded to decadron;however, her symptoms recurred with steroid taper. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hemophagocytosis. Whole exome sequencing (WES) revealed a heterozygous variant of uncertain significance in UNC13D c.962C>A (p.Thr321Asn). She had multiple re-admissions with significantly elevated inflammatory markers, including extremely high IL2-R, IL-18 and CXCL9. Each episode was complicated by an acute viral infection. She responds to high dose steroids, anti-IL-1, and JAK inhibitors. Nonetheless, it has been difficult to wean decadron without triggering a flare. She continues to require increasing doses of baricitinib. Discussion(s): MAS may be seen as a complication of rheumatic diseases, as well as inborn errors of immunity. However, none of these conditions have been diagnosed in this patient despite extensive testing, including WES. The degree of her immune dysregulation has been very severe making her disease process unpredictable and extremely difficult to control. She has frequent flares precipitated by viral infections or attempts at adjusting her immunomodulators. Weaning her medications has been challenging as she continues to require increasing doses of baricitinib and corticosteroids. The UNC13D gene is associated with autosomal recessive familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis type 3 (FHL3). Our patient is heterozygous for an UNC13D variant of uncertain significance. Additional genetic inquiries with whole genome sequencing to help elucidate the underlying etiology of her severe condition is being conducted. We hypothesize she developed MAS due to a combination of genetic predisposition, prior EBV infection, and immune stress associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Myocarditis due to COVID-19 in a pediatric patient

Current knowledge about the COVID-19 pandemic is still limited, especially in the pediatric age group. So far, children are considered to be a minimally affected population;however, physicians from different parts of the world have recognized a new pediatric multi-systemic inflammatory syndrome, that provokes a multiple organ dysfunction, from which the heart is not exempted. The direct action of the virus on myocardial cells, as well as the cytokines storm -triggered by the infection- are responsible for the myocarditis developed in these patients. In this article a case with criteria of myocarditis associated with COVID-19 is described. Achieving an early diagnosis ofmyocarditis secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection in the current epidemiological context allows a correct and timely therapeutic approach, avoiding the torpid evolution and fatal outcome of this disease, as well as other long-term complications.

Incidence and Persistence of Post-COVID-19 Conditions in the Year Following Initial Diagnosis

Objectives: Long-COVID, the persistence of various symptoms after COVID-19 infection, is still not fully understood. This study evaluated the incidence and chronicity of post-COVID-19 conditions using administrative claims, which provide a large, generalizable sample, to provide insight into the scope of long-COVID in the United States. Method(s): Patients newly diagnosed with COVID-19 from 4/1/2020-3/31/2021 were identified in the MerativeTM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases. The first COVID-19 diagnosis served as the index date and patients were continuously eligible for 12-months pre- and post-index. Incident conditions were defined as a new diagnosis (no pre-period diagnoses) for one of 17 conditions of interest in the first 60-days of the post-period. Among patients with an incident condition, chronicity of the condition was assessed over the remaining post-period (long-term conditions). Result(s): The sample included 503,742 patients;mean+/-SD age was 39.5+/-16.5 and 46% were male. The most common incident conditions were respiratory symptoms (24.1%), fatigue (7.3%), muscle pain (6.0%), and headache (5.9%). Among patients with each of these conditions, long-term persistence was observed in 21.9% for respiratory symptoms, 36.8% for muscle pain, 18.3% for fatigue, and 16.0% for headache. Fewer than 5% patients evidenced incident anxiety, mood disorders, myocarditis, sleep disorders, or pulmonary embolism;however, among these patients, over 40% had long-term persistence of the condition. Among patients with long-term conditions, sleep disorders (248+/-98 days), mood disorders (239+/-96 days), anxiety (236+/-95 days), respiratory symptoms (233+/-92 days), and asthma (230+/-93 days) had the longest average durations of persistence, evidenced by continued claims over the post-period. Conclusion(s): With the continued presence of COVID-19 an understanding of the risk of long-term symptoms is needed to help manage patients both during and following infection. These findings provide some initial insight into the incidence and tenure of various conditions that are affecting patients diagnosed with COVID-19.Copyright © 2023

CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS AFTER CORONAVIRUS DISEASE-2019

The data of the modern literature describing the long-term consequences of infection of the body with SARSCoV-2 on the cardiovascular system in the framework of postcovid syndrome are analyzed. To date, postcovid syndrome refers to a condition in which symptoms continue to persist for more than 12 weeks from the moment of diagnosis of COVID-19. Various complaints of patients after undergoing a new coronavirus infection are described, the distinguishing feature of which is their versatility, where cardiovascular manifestations are assigned one of the leading roles. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, cardiac arrhythmia and conduction disorders are considered. The role of SARS-CoV-2 in the formation of de novo and decompensation of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases has been demonstrated. The possibility of developing heart failure in patients with COVID-19 as an outcome of inflammation of the heart muscle is shown. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the incidence of myocarditis after 3 months or more from the diagnosis of COVID-19, as well as thrombotic complications, in the genesis of which the main role belongs to the formation of endothelial dysfunction resulting from the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with vascular endothelial cells. The autoimmune component of the pathogenesis of damage to the cardiovascular system as a result of the formation of endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 is also considered. The authors present a laboratory-instrumental algorithm for determining cardiovascular complications in people who have undergone COVID-19, including the determination of the N-terminal fragment of the brain natriuretic peptide B-type prohormone, the level of anticardial antibodies, electrocardiography, echocardiography, as well as magnetic resonance imaging of the heart with contrast. All rights reserved © Eco-Vector, 2022.

Report of the Association Between Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Severe Myocarditis

Introduction: The people worldwide have been affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection since its appearance in December, 2019. Kawasaki disease-like hyperinflammatory shock associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously healthy children has been reported in the literature, which is now referred to as a multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Some aspects of MIS-C are similar to those of Kawasaki disease, toxic shock syndrome, secondary hemophagocytic syndrome, and macrophage activation syndrome. Case Presentation: This study reported an 11-year-old boy with MIS-C presented with periorbital and peripheral edema, abdominal pain, elevated liver enzymes, severe right pleural effusion, moderate ascites, and severe failure of right and left ventricles. Conclusion(s): Due to the increasing number of reported cases of critically ill patients afflicted with MIS-C and its life-threatening complications, it was recommended that further studies should be carried out in order to provide screening tests for myocardial dysfunction. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach was found inevitable.Copyright © 2023, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Post-Covid Myocarditis Simulating Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background: Acute myocarditis corresponds to an acute inflammation of the myocardium whose origin is most often viral. Several viruses can be incriminated to note the parvovirus B19, the virus herpes of the group 6 and to a lesser degree the virus of the hepatitis C (VHC) [18,19]. Since 2019 and with the discovery of SARS COV2 some cases of myocarditis associated with covid have been noted, this last association is rare and is present in only 5% of cases [8]. The diagnosis of myocarditis is sometimes difficult and can lead to confusion with acute coronary syndrome, especially in cases of ST-segment elevation on the EKG, hence the interest of magnetic resonance imaging, which has made it possible in recent years to reduce the rate of unnecessary coronary angiography, especially in the case of young subjects with no cardiovascular risk factors. in this context we report the case of a 33 year old patient with no cardiovascular risk factors and no medical or surgical antecedents who was admitted to the emergency department for the management of acute chest pain related to acute post-covid myocarditis, the patient was initially admitted to the cardiology intensive care unit where he was put in condition and under analgesic treatment and under therapeutic protocal of covid 19 and under anticoagulation based on low molecular weight heparin at preventive dose with a good clinical evolution he was transferred thereafter to the clinical cardiology then declared outgoing under treatment of covid 19 with an appointment of control in 1 month.

TIME MANAGEMENT AND RISK FACTORS IN LIFE-THREATENING ANCA-VASCULITIS

BackgroundAccuracy of diagnosis and prompt therapeutic intervention are the mainstay in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis(AAV) suffering from life-threatening complications [1].However, there is no definition of therapeutic window in vital AAV, nor its impact on patient outcome regarding length of hospital stay, intensive care unit(ICU) admission or survival.ObjectivesThe aim of the study is to analyze the process of care from the perspective of time management in vital organ involvement AAV patients and to identify potential risk factors for ICU admission.MethodsA retrospective multicenter study identified AAV patients with life-threatening organ involvement, defined as alveolar hemorrhage, rapidly progressive renal failure, myocarditis and cerebral granuloma. Demographic data was collected. Key time frames were recorded, namely the interval from acute symptom onset to hospital presentation, days until imaging(plain X-ray, cardiac ultrasound, CT-scan), time to therapeutic intervention with corticosteroids or biologic/non-biologic immunosuppression(cyclophosphamide or rituximab) and to renal replacement therapy(RRT) or plasmapheresis. Time to ICU admission, hospital length-of-stay, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score(BVAS) were also noted. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and Chi-square and Pearson correlation tests were applied.Results66 patients with AAV were enrolled, out of which 17 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Mean age in the study group was 58.6±11.1 years old,10 patients(58.8%) were females and 7 (41.2%) males.11(64.7%) patients were c-ANCA positive, while 6 (35.3%) had p-ANCA and all were diagnosed with AAV prior to life-threatening event. Two patients had COVID-19 triggered AAV.In the study group, the most frequent critical organ suffering was rapidly progressive renal failure(12), followed by alveolar hemorrhages(10), 2 cerebral granulomas and one acute myocarditis. Three patients(17.6%) had more than one vital manifestation. Ten patients(58.8%) had more than three additional non-organ-threatening manifestations. Mean interval from AAV diagnosis to emergency admission was 30.1± 61.1 days, median 3 and from severe episode onset to hospitalization 1.65±0.18 days, median 1. There was only one death in the study group. Three patients were admitted in the ICU in 0.59±1.5 days following hospital presentation and required either RRT or plasma exchange within 2.66 days. Imaging examination was performed unanimously the day upon hospital admission. All patients received corticosteroids in the first 5.95±14.3 days, while immunosuppression was given to 13(76.5%) patients within 11.5±15.5 days from hospitalization.12 patients(70.5%) suffered from associated infections. Mean BVAS(13.6±6.76) correlated to ICU admission(p 0.013, r 0.58).Patients in ICU revealed higher BVAS(22±9.53) versus non-ICU(11.8±4.76).Hospital length of stay was 14.7±10.7 days(median 14) and showed no relationship to the type of severe organ involvement. The need for ICU caring was dominant in males(p 0.05) and confirmed in patients with proteinuria(p 0.012) and at least two major organ damage.ConclusionThis study shows that severity risk factors for potential ICU admission for life-threatening AAV appear to be male gender, proteinuria and the number of affected organs.Moreover, BVAS should be considered a useful tool to predict patients' risk for intensive care management since a higher score indicates a more aggressive disease.However, time to investigational or therapeutic intervention did not correlate to patient outcome in AAV.References[1]Geetha, D., Seo, P. (2011). Life-Threatening Presentations of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. In: Khamashta, M., Ramos-Casals, M. (eds) Autoimmune Diseases. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-358-9_8Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

PERICARDITIS AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION: A CASE SERIES

BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccination campaigns successfully impacted on viral spreading and in particular on clinical course of the disease. However, secondary to a highly extended vaccination program, several local and systemic adverse events associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been reported. Pericarditis and myocarditis are examples of cardiac complications related to these vaccines. In particular, cases of pericarditis have occurred after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (mostly secondary to vaccination with Moderna than Pfizer-BioNTech), especially in male adolescents and young adults, more often after the second dose. The incidence is approximately of 1-2 cases/100.000.ObjectivesAim of our study was to study the clinical profile of pericarditis occurred within 30 days after COVID-19 vaccines in our clinic.MethodsWe present a case series of patients who developed pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination in the Department of Internal Medicine at Fatebenefratelli Hospital in Milan, followed from December 1, 2021 to April 15, 2022.ResultsTwenty-five individuals, of which 18 (72%) were women and 7 (28%) were males, had vaccine related pericarditis. Two patients were vaccinated with AstraZeneca, 2 with Moderna, the remaining with Pfizer-BioNTech. Median age was of 42 years. Of all patients, one subject was affected by constrictive effusive pericarditis, while another required treatment of pericarditis with Anakinra, switched to Canakinumab after severe skin reactions, because of failure of therapeutic response to first-line treatments.Two patients required hospital admission, in one case for a transient constrictive pericarditis. In the remaining cases clinical symptoms associated with post-vaccines pericarditis were mild and didn't require hospitalization.Chest pain was reported in 100% of cases, whereas pericardial effusion (in one case larger than 10 mm) was evidenced in 30% of subjects. Eighty percent of patients experienced tachycardia, whereas 90% reported asthenia.An increase in indices of inflammation (CRP) was documented in 50% of patients, usually mild.With regard to therapy, 90% of patients were treated with NSAIDs, 95% with colchicine, while 50% of cases required treatment with low-dose steroids.ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccination induces a particular form of pericarditis, often insidious and very troublesome, but with good prognosis. The clinical phenotype showed less typical chest pain, often normal indices of inflammation and little or no instrumental changes, but patients often experimented tachycardia and functional limitation. With regard to therapy, we used NSAIDs at adequate dosages to control the clinical condition, or low-dose colchicine. Low doses of cortisone (e.g., prednisone 5-10 mg a day) were useful in the presence of marked asthenia or systemic symptoms. Beta-blockers or ivabradine were used in the presence of tachycardia.References[1]Barda N, Children 2021, 8(7), 607;Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 in a Nationwide setting. N Engl J med 2021;385:1078-1090.[2]Diaz GA, Myocarditis and Pericarditis After Vaccination for COVID-19. JAMA 2021;326 (12): 1210-1212.[3]Bibhuti D, Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: What Do We Know So Far?. Children 2021, 8(7), 607.[4]Giacomo Maria Viani, Patrizia Pedrotti, Romano Seregni, and Brucato Antonio;Effusive–constrictive pericarditis after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine (Comirnaty): a case report;European Heart Journal - Case Reports (2022) 6(2), 1–6.[5]Francesco Perna, Elena Verecchia, Gaetano Pinnacchio, Laura Gerardino, Antonio Brucato, and Raffaele Manna;Rapid resolution of severe pericardial effusion using anakinra in a patient with COVID-19 vaccine-related acute pericarditis relapse:a case report;European Heart Journal - Case Reports (2022) 6, 1–6.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

A CLINICAL CASE OF MULTISYSTEM INFLAMMATORY SYNDROME IN CHILDREN ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW CORONAVIRUS INFECTION (COVID-19).

The article presents a clinical case of diagnosis and treatment of children's multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in a 12-year-old girl. The clinical picture, the dynamics of the disease, the results of instrumental and laboratory findings and successful treatment of the patient are described.Copyright © 2022 Stavropol State Medical University. All rights reserved.

ECMO in acute fulminant myocarditis in pediatrics

Objectives: To describe our experience in ECMO for acute myocarditis Methods: Descriptive, retrospective study (2018-2022) of a cohort of 8 patients < 16 years with acute myocarditis who were assisted on ECMO. Result(s): 8 patients were collected, (6 females), with a mean age 7;8 years [range 0;1-13;8]. In 7/8, the reason for cannulation was hemodynamic instability refractory to medical treatment, with a mean inotropic score of 70 [range 10-122]. Sixty-two percent presented cardiorespiratory arrest prior to cannulation and 2 of them needed ECRP. The mean precannulation troponin level was 1498 ng/ml [range 89-6212]. Primary transport was performed in 4 patients. ECMO was peripheral veno-arterial in 100%, jugulo-carotid in 2/8 and femoro-femoral in 6/8. All patients underwent atrioseptostomy. They received treatment with levosimendan, immunoglobulins, corticoids and carnitine. In 4 acute infectious etiology was confirmed (parvovirus, influenza and SARSCoV2), another one was due to PIMS-TS and in 3 no etiology was found. Six patients underwent myocardial biopsy and 5 of them showed inflammatory infiltrates. The mean time on ECMO was 8 days [range 3-14], 2 of them requiring 2 ECMO courses. The mean length of PICU stay was 21 days [range 10-50]. Two were transferred to a heart transplant center. The main complications were arterial hypertension (88%), bleeding (63%), neurological (50%), arrhythmias (38%), coagulopathy (38%) and infectious (38%). One patient required renal replacement therapy. 1 patient died, 2 had moderate neurological sequels. Conclusion(s): ECMO is a therapeutic option in patients with fulminant myocarditis refractory to medical treatment and may help improve their prognosis.

Anca negative egpa myocarditis/ heart failure

163 Figure 1 163 Figure 2Conflict of InterestNONE

ADVERSE EVENTS AFTER VACCINATION FOR SARS-CoV2 IN A CASE SERIES OF FIBROMYALGIA PATIENTS VERSUS HEALTHY CONTROLS

BackgroundFibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic widespread pain syndrome of unknown origin that leads to hypersensitivity for physical, chemical and/or psychic triggers. Vaccination, as an inflammatory stimulus and as a psychologically stressful act, could represent a challenge for these patients.ObjectivesWe aimed to investigate the incidence of adverse reactions after vaccination for Sars-Cov2 in a series of FM patients versus healthy controls.MethodsWe recruited 65 consecutive FM patients classified according to the 2016 ACR diagnostic criteria¹ (M/F: 5/60;mean age 53.6 +/-12.5 years), without other associated rheumatologic conditions, and 65 age/sex-matched healthy controls.All patients filled a questionnaire in order to investigate eventual adverse events occurring up to 6 months after administration of a Sars-Cov2 vaccine. The questionnaire was divided into two parts: the first part included the patient's demographic information, the vaccine type performed and the anamnestic data. In the second part, the individuals described all new symptoms or signs occurred after the first, the second or the third dose of Sars-Cov2 vaccine.ResultsOverall, FM patients reported a higher frequency of adverse events after Sars-Cov2 vaccination in comparison with healthy controls. In particular, 44/65 FM patients vs. 11/65 controls complained of exacerbation of diffuse pain (p<0.001). Fatigue, diarrhea, sweating, tingles, headache, dizziness, transient respiratory discomfort, and paroxysmal vision blurring were also more frequent in FM patients than controls (47/65 vs. 30/65, p=0.004;6/65 vs. 0/65, p=0.028;18/65 vs. 8/65, p=0.047;20/65 vs. 0/65, p<0.001;22/65 vs. 9/65, p=0.013;21/65 vs. 5/65, p<0.001;10/65 vs 1/65, p=0.009;17/65 vs. 2/65, p< 0.001, respectively).No significant difference between FM and the control group as regards fever was reported (24/65 vs. 30/65;p=0.7).Interestingly, swelling at the injection vaccine site was more commonly reported in controls (9/65 vs. 20/65;p=0.034).Finally, one case of Bell's palsy was registered in the FM series while one case of myocarditis in the control group.ConclusionFM patients showed an increased frequency of adverse events to Sars-Cov2 vaccination compared to healthy controls. In particular, all the symptoms reported seemed to be associated with the functional hypersensitivity that characterizes FM.Reference[1]Wolfe F, et Al. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Dec;46(3):319-329.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

SARS-CoV-2 infection and myocarditis / Infección por SARS-CoV-2 y miocarditis

COVID-19 es una enfermedad infecciosa respiratoria aguda, causada por el SARS-CoV-2, un nuevo coronavirus, que se extendió rápidamente por todo el mundo, dando como resultado una pandemia. Los pacientes presentan un amplio espectro de manifestaciones clínicas, entre ellas, la miocarditis, y de manera alterna, algunos pacientes sin síntomas de enfermedad cardíaca, tienen anomalías en las pruebas, como elevación de la troponina y arritmias cardíacas en el electrocardiograma, o anomalías en las imágenes cardíacas. La patogenia del compromiso miocárdico no es clara, pero las dos principales teorías prevén un papel directo de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina 2, que funciona como el receptor viral, y una respuesta hiperinmune, que también puede conducir a una presentación aislada. El estándar de oro del diagnóstico es la biopsia endomiocárdica, la cual no está disponible en la mayoría de los escenarios. En esta revisión, se pretende brindar al lector pautas para identificar las manifestaciones clínicas, ayudas diagnósticas y manejo de los pacientes con sospecha de miocarditis por COVID-19

COVID-19 is an acute respiratory infectious disease caused by a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 virus, that spread rapidly around the world, resulting in a pandemic. Patients present with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, including myocarditis, and alternately, some patients without symptoms of heart disease have abnormalities in tests, such as elevated troponin, arrhythmias in the ECG orabnormalities in cardiac imaging testing. The pathogenesis of myocardial involvement is not completely clear, but the two main theories suggest a direct role of the angiotensin-converting enzyme, which functions as the virus receptor, and a hyperimmune response, which can also lead to an isolated presentation. The gold standard for the diagnosis is the endomyocardial biopsy, which is not available in most settings. In this review, we intend to provide the reader with guidelines to identify the clinical manifestations, diagnostic tools, and management of patients with suspected COVID-19 myocarditis

Pathophysiological effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the cardiovascular system and its clinical manifestations-a mini review.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 may have a mild presentation, with few symptoms, or progress to a severe condition, characterized by generalized inflammation, systemic microvascular involvement, coagulopathy, and pulmonary and cardiovascular complications. Men present with more severe symptoms than women, especially men who are older and who present with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and a history of atherosclerotic diseases. Owing to its association with endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, thrombosis, and microvascular obstruction, SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause lesions in several organs, including the myocardium and the coronary arterial bed, which can result in clinical manifestations involving the cardiovascular system. In this mini review, we summarize the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the cardiovascular system in both children and adults and characterize the various clinical manifestations associated with this disease.

Revitalizing myocarditis treatment through gut microbiota modulation: unveiling a promising therapeutic avenue.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that gut microbiota plays an important role in the development and treatment of different cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and atherosclerosis. Furthermore, evidence from recent studies has shown that gut microbiota contributes to the development of myocarditis. Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease that often results in myocardial damage. Myocarditis is a common cause of sudden cardiac death in young adults. The incidence of myocarditis and its associated dilated cardiomyopathy has been increasing yearly. Myocarditis has gained significant attention on social media due to its association with both COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccinations. However, the current therapeutic options for myocarditis are limited. In addition, little is known about the potential therapeutic targets of myocarditis. In this study, we review (1) the evidence on the gut-heart axis, (2) the crosslink between gut microbiota and the immune system, (3) the association between myocarditis and the immune system, (4) the impact of gut microbiota and its metabolites on myocarditis, (5) current strategies for modulating gut microbiota, (6) challenges and future directions for targeted gut microbiota in the treatment of myocarditis. The approach of targeting the gut microbiota in myocarditis is still in its infancy, and this is the study to explore the gut microbiota-immune system-myocarditis axis. Our findings are expected to pave the way for the use of gut microbiota as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of myocarditis.

A Pharmacoepidemiological Study of Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following the First Dose of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Europe.

This study assessed the myocarditis and pericarditis reporting rate of the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in Europe. Myocarditis and pericarditis data pertinent to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (1 January 2021-11 February 2022) from EudraVigilance database were combined with European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)'s vaccination tracker data. The reporting rate was expressed as events (occurring within 28 days of the first dose) per 1 million individuals vaccinated. An observed-to-expected (OE) analysis quantified excess risk for myocarditis or pericarditis following the first mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. The reporting rate of myocarditis per 1 million individuals vaccinated was 17.27 (95% CI, 16.34-18.26) for CX-024414 and 8.44 (95% CI, 8.18-8.70) for TOZINAMERAN; and of pericarditis, 9.76 (95% CI, 9.06-10.51) for CX-024414 and 5.79 (95% CI, 5.56-6.01) for TOZINAMERAN. Both vaccines produced a myocarditis standardized morbidity ratio (SMR) > 1, with the CX-024414 vaccine having a greater SMR than TOZINAMERAN. Regarding TOZINAMERAN, SMR for pericarditis was >1 when considering the lowest background incidence, but <1 when considering the highest background incidence. Our results suggest an excess risk of myocarditis following the first dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, but the relationship between pericarditis and the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine remains unclear.

Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review.

COVID-19 vaccination has significantly reduced both the morbidity and mortality rates associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccines, especially mRNA vaccines, have been proposed in several studies to complicate viral myocarditis. Thus, our systematic and meta-analysis review aims to further investigate the possibility of an association between COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid, and Google Scholar and did a gray search of other databases using the following keywords and terms: "Myocarditis ("Myocarditis" Mesh) OR "Chagas Cardiomyopathy" Mesh) AND "COVID-19 Vaccines" Mesh. The studies were limited to only English articles that reported myocardial inflammation or myocarditis associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Pooled risk ratio with its 95% confidence interval was analyzed by RevMan software (5.4) to perform the meta-analysis. Our study included 671 patients from 44 studies with a mean age of 14-40 years. Nevertheless, myocarditis was noted in a mean of (3.227) days, and 4.19 per million vaccination recipients experienced myocarditis. Most cases were clinically presented with manifestations of cough, chest pain, and fever. Laboratory tests revealed increased C-reactive protein, and troponin with all other cardiac markers in most patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed late gadolinium enhancement with myocardial edema and cardiomegaly. Also, electrocardiograms revealed ST-segment elevation in most patients. Furthermore, the incidence of myocarditis was statistically significantly lower in the COVID-19 vaccine group as compared with the control group (RR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.10-0.23, p-value < 0.00001). No significant association was found between COVID-19 vaccines and the incidence of myocarditis. The study's findings highlight the importance of implementing evidence-based COVID-19 prevention strategies, such as vaccination, to reduce the public health impact of COVID-19 and its associated complications.